BAYKO and the 1961 Moscow British Trade Fair

According to page 277 of 'MECCANO Magazine', August, 1961, [right] MECCANO was one of the six hundred and seventy seven firms who attended the British Trade Fair in Moscow in May, 1961. Unfortunately, the article makes no mention of BAYKO. I'm not sure whether to read too much into that, however, as the magazine doesn't even carry an advert for the world's first, and finest, plastic construction toy. Indeed 'MECCANO Magazine' seems to have had an uncomfortable relationship with BAYKO. It really is worth pointing out that May, 1961 was very much contemporary with the Set #13 and set #14 launches.
Page 277 of MECCANO Magazine with an article about the Moscow Trade Fair in May 1961
However, although I've no direct evidence for BAYKO's involvement in it, there is circumstantial evidence that MECCANO's presence in Moscow probably did included it.
The evidence, while not being absolutely cut and dried, is, I believe, totally compelling. I've only ever seen one Russian language MECCANO General Products Leaflet, which logic demands must surely be contemporary [or thereabouts] with this article, which certainly does include BAYKO
MECCANO Magazine, August, 1961 page 229
That, I thought, was that, until Andy Harris, who clearly knows better than me, showed me the second image [below] and proved just what a dozy so-and-so I really am!
He drew my attention to a second entry, or, perhaps, that should be the first entry, referring to the Moscow Trade Fair. It is some eight pages earlier, in the very same August, 1961 issue of 'MECCANO Magazine', on page 269. It is there, hidden inconspicuously on what is, in effect, the first page proper of the magazine.
In truth, it doesn't add a lot to our knowledge of the Fair, however, there is absolutely no doubt at all that, this time, BAYKO is actually mentioned! It is there as part of the list of the range of MECCANO products included in the displays…
…so we now know that BAYKO really was there!
Thanks for wakening me up Andy!
If you've any more info. on the 1961 Moscow British Trade Fair, I'd love to hear from you…
That's just what Rosemary Field did in bringing the next article to my attention. The rest of this page is several notches higher on whatever 'highbrow index' you care to employ. It is an article on the 1961 Moscow Trade Fair in the June 2nd, 1961 edition of the 'SPECTATOR' magazine [pages 30, 32 and 33]. I've decided to include the article in full, [below] even though there is no specific mention of either MECCANO or BAYKO - I know, unbelievable!!! Perhaps it it worth pointing out that the source document for the list of contributors to the show was effectively a general 'shopping list' by the Soviets.
Faith in what? Have British businessmen suddenly gone starry-eyed over the USSR as a market? Before trying to suggest an answer, a distinction must be made between manufacturers of capital goods and purveyors of consumer goods.
The nature of the Soviet economy is such that it chiefly buys capital goods from the West, and a number of British firms are already well in this particular market. Furthermore, although the Russians already sell us considerably more than they buy from us, they do not use their surplus sterling to increase their purchases of manufactured goods from the UK, but instead buy essential raw materials from elsewhere in the sterling area, e.g., Malayan rubber. This policy is the natural consequence of the long-term aim of their economic planning, to make themselves an economically self-sufficient unit which, when a state of autarchy has been achieved, will have no need to import anything. According to Khrushchev himself, in a speech to a large audience of British businessmen in Moscow last week, the Soviet Union has completed the build-up of its essential sub-structure of heavy industry (for which Western capital goods have been and apparently still are needed) and is now preparing to fill in the gaps by providing a vastly improved standard of material well-being for this huge nation, avid for goods.
This is where British exporters see their chance: in particular the makers of plant and equipment catering for the needs of a highly developed, sophisticated economy - scientific instruments, machinery for making textiles, footwear, toys, plastic goods, laundry plant, medical and dental equipment, food packaging and processing machinery, to mention only a few of the groups of exhibitors in Moscow. The selection of wares on show has not been haphazard. As the organisers have been at pains to point out, the Fair does not consist of a clutch of Micawbers: 90 per cent of the exhibits are based on a detailed shopping list, provided by the Russians, of the goods in which Soviet buyers are interested. This is not confined to machinery for making things: the suppliers of manufactured goods are also exhibiting, although prima facie, their prospects of business are considerably less hopeful. The fashion industry in particular is gambling for high stakes. The dress merchants have not only greatly added to the panache of the Fair and temporarily raised the sadly low glamour-quotient of Muscovite life by putting on a fashion show twice daily, but they have thereby been able to do something virtually denied to any other consumer goods exhibitor: direct, hard sell advertising to the Soviet buying public.
Spectator article, June 2, 1961 - page 30
The organisation of the fashion show is one of the best examples of the thought, ingenuity and sheer hard work which are an impressive feature of the whole Fair. The clothes shown have been chosen with a realistic sense of the needs of the market, and although the show was laced with enough chic and glitter to lift it above the level of the average local product, there was a firm emphasis on the sensible and wearable. Even the choice of models has deviated from the usual platoon of elegant bean-poles: some are so like well-set-up specimens of Soviet womanhood that many of the 2,000-strong audience take them for Russian girls. A by-product of the show is that Elizabeth Arden has already landed a useful order for make-up; and another firm, although in the fashion parade, has collared the whole quota for nylon fur coats. This shows that trade can be done with the Russians even in the more marginal consumer goods; but the feeling among businessmen here is still that it is a chancy affair which depends on factors over which the traders themselves have no control.

Spectator article, June 2, 1961 - page 32

Everyone knows that the Soviet Union has a totally planned economy and sets firm quotas on the importation of every type of commodity, but it is not perhaps generally realised that even if the seller has exactly the right product at the right price which the Russians clearly want and for which they have allocated a quota, there is never a definite assurance, as there would be in a parallel case when trading with a capitalist country, that the buyer will suit the action to the word and place an order. The planners, taking their place in the queue with other buying agencies, argued about the importance of their particular order and generally lobbied and pulled all the wires known to the Soviet bureaucrat. After that they may get their application approved, they may get it reduced, or they may get nothing at all according to whether the overall plan is working well or whether there is a shortfall in sterling earnings at that moment.
Clearly these are conditions of business under which no trader would operate from choice. Indeed, one of the official Communist explanations for the increased British interest in trade with the Soviet Union is that as we lose our captive colonial markets, and as competition for markets between the capitalist countries grows more savage, we are being forced in desperation to turn to the Communist countries. Of course, this doctrine fails to take into account the fact that the political independence of former colonies, at least in Britain's case, does not mean that our economic links with them are broken and that often our trade with such countries actually increases as their purchasing power rises, thanks to past British capital investment in their economies. In any case, it is the very opposite of a sign of debility in a trading nation to be probing outwards to enlarge existing markets and seek new ones.
Even this urge, though, does not fully explain why a considerable section of the cream of British industry is putting its money on such a relatively dark horse as Anglo-Soviet trade. What are firms right across the board, from ICI to Cobble Brothers Machinery Co. Ltd. of Blackburn, hoping for? The variety of answers given to this question is almost as great as the number of stands at the Trade Fair. The Big Five banks and the groupings such as the Iron and Steel Federation may feel that it is a matter of prestige: the giant concerns and consortia such as AEI, Distillers, Hawker-Siddeley, Vickers or Rustyfa are in it because there is no market in the world in which they can afford to be absent: the large and medium engineering, electrical, chemical or electronic firms with a first-class specialised product may scent a thumping order which could give them the edge over their less adventurous competitors - and some may be just out for pot luck.
Spectator article, June 2, 1961 - page 33
It is also an undoubted fact that the very unfamiliarity and difficulty in trading with the Soviet Union can give an enviable cachet to any firm which manages to land a Russian order. In all these reasons there seems to be a common factor at the back of the minds of all the participants in what is an unusually vigorous and costly piece of British sales promotion. This common factor is a feeling that the Soviet giant, having spent forty-odd years forging the tools to make his own living, is on the point of becoming rich enough and hungry enough to be an extremely worthwhile customer for British goods. We know that those 200 million are going to need a lot of things that they don't make or that we can make better. So, they say, let's get a foot in the door even if it hurts, and be one of the first on the escalator for a change instead of puffing along behind the Germans, the Americans and the Japanese.
Whether bigger and better business with the Soviet Union will result depends partly on their efforts and partly on the trade talks which have just started between the two governments. Mr. Maudling, President of the Board of Trade, came to Moscow to open the Trade Fair, but he. came primarily to conduct preliminary negotiations for the annual revision of the five-year Anglo-Soviet Trade Treaty. At the time of writing it seems that the talks have started well and that the Russians are in earnest about expanding trade. Both sides have agreed at the preliminary meetings that restrictions to trade should be removed and the Soviets have made little more than a perfunctory reference to the strategic embargo list: it seems clear that this is little more than a Propaganda debating point, since they are now concerned with more pressing problems.
Is it just me, or is the fact that two of the three cartoons included alongside the article are toy related significant? I couldn't help but feel a frisson of pride if not amazement that “Cobble Brothers Machinery Co. Ltd. of Blackburn”, my home town, were given a specific mention, albeit as an example of the more modest participants.
Below here are links to related info : -
Click on any of the links below for related information.

The 'Flaming BAYKOMAN' site logo

Latest update - August 10, 2022
The BAYKO name and Logo are the Registered Trade Mark of Transport of Delight.